incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Marinschek" <martin.marinsc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Proposal] JavaScript Popup Calendar
Date Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:42:05 GMT
Prepare it for Trinidad - I'll have a look at it when it's finished,
and will take it over for tomahawk if I like it!

regards,

Martin

On 7/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> On 7/14/06, Dan Robinson <dannyjrobinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > However, I'm lost in the to-and-fro's of podling, merging tomahawk, etc.
> > Was anything decided?  Where do you want this stuff to go, or do we work
> > alone until we have something ready?
>
> not yet. The merge is not a "from day to day" thing.
> For now, we don't have a solution for that stuff.
>
> Matt
>
> > D.
> >
> >
> > On 7/8/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Does the Dojo datepicker support internationalization?  This is a
> > > must-have.
> > > I tried switching my browser to French but it still came up in English.
> > >
> > > Also, I'd be -1 on adding something if it couldn't support Trinidad
> > > skinning.
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How do you call this ?
> > > >
> > > > http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html
> > > <http://dojotoolkit.org/%7Edylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html>
> > > >
> > > > On 7/8/06, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > yeah, dojo would be great - but dojo doesn't have a popup calendar
so
> > > > far!
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >  cool to hear martin,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > what's up, should we both take a look at dojo?
> > > > > > (the xml way)?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/7/06, Martin Marinschek < martin.marinschek@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > One thing more - I don't like the javascript codebase of
the
> > > current
> > > > > > > tomahawk calendar, just to put this into the discussion.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So if someone comes up with a better solution (and the
same or
> > > > better
> > > > > > > functionality) I'll happily put this component into tomahawk
as
> > > > well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org >
wrote:
> > > > > > > > More...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > at ApacheCon Bernd and me also discussed about, what's
with the
> > > > tobago
> > > > > > > > code base. Stuff like upload can be *unified* for
all these
> > > three
> > > > libs.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger < mkienenb@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Moving to dev.....
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > good idea
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Well, not to be a pain about it, but the
inability of some
> > > > users to
> > > > > > > > > > use a released product like Tomahawk shouldn't
be driving
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > development decisions of a podling.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > sure!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The need to have a popup calendar looks
like a perfect trial
> > > > run of
> > > > > > > > > > merging the two code bases, and I'd hate
to see someone go
> > > out
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > reinvent the popup calendar "wheel" yet
another time when
> > > > we've
> > > > > > > > > > already got two or three of them.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > sure, popup cal. is just a *simple* example of
that.
> > > > > > > > > We have a wiki for identifing some task. Feel
free to add
> > > > content.
> > > > > > > > > (see [1]).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Realistically, merging the two is probably
going to be more
> > > a
> > > > matter
> > > > > > > > > > of porting Tomahawk components over to Trinidad
than the
> > > other
> > > > way
> > > > > > > > > > around, I'm guessing, so maybe I'm arguing
over semantics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yeah, sorta. The Trinidad podling for instance
has already
> > > > > > > > > *buid-in*support for Facelets. Tomahawk has also
some goodies.
> > > > This
> > > > > > > > > task (merging) won't be a short one (IMO)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Matt
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/Identify_components_to_merge_into_Tomahawk_Shared
> > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hey Mike,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > yes that is the goal. but for some
reasons user's won't /
> > > > can't use
> > > > > > > > > > > Tomahawk (or MyFaces) in their production.
I think that
> > > was
> > > > the reason
> > > > > > > > > > > for this thread. Creating a custom
one on top of the
> > > > Trinidad Podling
> > > > > > > > > > > is ok for me. For the tomahawk stuff,
we should take a
> > > look
> > > > at Dojo
> > > > > > > > > > > ([1]). On the ApacheCon I saw that
they have now "xml
> > > > namespaces",
> > > > > > > > > > > means <dojo:wiget ... /> instead
of *hacking* JS.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I know some projects, that are not
allowed to use MyFaces;
> > > > they stick
> > > > > > > > > > > with IBM or the RI.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html<http://dojotoolkit.org/%7Edylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger < mkienenb@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Could someone refresh my memory?
 Was the eventual goal
> > > to
> > > > merge
> > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and Tomahawk?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > If so, I think creating Yet Another
Popup Calendar
> > > rather
> > > > than making
> > > > > > > > > > > > the existing tomahawk popup calendars
play nice with
> > > > Trinidad is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > step in the wrong direction.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > However, I could be off-base on
the eventual goal for
> > > > these two libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Adam Winer < awiner@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It would definitely be of
interest!  (IMO, it would
> > > need
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > handle internationalization
and localization - I'd
> > > like
> > > > to keep Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > consistent in this regard.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Dan Robinson <
dannyjrobinson@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just a quick prompt
to see if there is interest in
> > > > such a feature.  We may
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > have capacity to contribute.
 I see this being
> > > > rendered in 'inaccessible'
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mode only, perhaps instead
of the window'ed calendar
> > > -
> > > > thoughts.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson
< dannyjrobinson@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ernst. 
We're really trying not to stray
> > > from
> > > > Trinidad as a core
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > library.  However,
I do like the look of the
> > > > Tomahawk version, so that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > make a very good
start.  I guess I'm looking for
> > > > guidance as to where
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fit and how
it would be configured - and
> > > > indeed if people think
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad needs
one!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Ernst
Fastl < ernst.fastl@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a
calendar with a JS-Popup mode in the
> > > > tomahawk-component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > library.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look
at:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at/myfaces/calendar.jsf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you
can use this one, or at least if you
> > > > want to implement
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > something
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar in
trinidad learn from this one.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ernst
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06,
Dan Robinson <dannyjrobinson@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would
there be interest in a 3rd calendar mode
> > > > whereby it popsup a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JavaScript
calendar, rather than just the
> > > inline
> > > > and windowed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > versions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so,
is there one out there that people
> > > would
> > > > like to see as the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > basis on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which
to build?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Danny
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > futher stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > futher stuff:
> > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > futher stuff:
> > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > futher stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > futher stuff:
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chordiant Software Inc.
> > www.chordiant.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Mime
View raw message