incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Robinson" <dannyjrobin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Proposal] JavaScript Popup Calendar
Date Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:49:21 GMT
OK, so the requirements seem clear, internationalisation, skinning, not
re-inventing wheel (dojo if appropriate), etc.

However, I'm lost in the to-and-fro's of podling, merging tomahawk, etc.
Was anything decided?  Where do you want this stuff to go, or do we work
alone until we have something ready?

D.


On 7/8/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Does the Dojo datepicker support internationalization?  This is a
> must-have.
> I tried switching my browser to French but it still came up in English.
>
> Also, I'd be -1 on adding something if it couldn't support Trinidad
> skinning.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > How do you call this ?
> >
> > http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html
> <http://dojotoolkit.org/%7Edylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html>
> >
> > On 7/8/06, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > yeah, dojo would be great - but dojo doesn't have a popup calendar so
> > far!
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >  cool to hear martin,
> > > >
> > > > what's up, should we both take a look at dojo?
> > > > (the xml way)?
> > > >
> > > > On 7/7/06, Martin Marinschek < martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > One thing more - I don't like the javascript codebase of the
> current
> > > > > tomahawk calendar, just to put this into the discussion.
> > > > >
> > > > > So if someone comes up with a better solution (and the same or
> > better
> > > > > functionality) I'll happily put this component into tomahawk as
> > well.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > > More...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > at ApacheCon Bernd and me also discussed about, what's with
the
> > tobago
> > > > > > code base. Stuff like upload can be *unified* for all these
> three
> > libs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger < mkienenb@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > Moving to dev.....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > good idea
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Well, not to be a pain about it, but the inability
of some
> > users to
> > > > > > > > use a released product like Tomahawk shouldn't be
driving
> the
> > > > > > > > development decisions of a podling.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > sure!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The need to have a popup calendar looks like a perfect
trial
> > run of
> > > > > > > > merging the two code bases, and I'd hate to see someone
go
> out
> > and
> > > > > > > > reinvent the popup calendar "wheel" yet another time
when
> > we've
> > > > > > > > already got two or three of them.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > sure, popup cal. is just a *simple* example of that.
> > > > > > > We have a wiki for identifing some task. Feel free to add
> > content.
> > > > > > > (see [1]).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Realistically, merging the two is probably going to
be more
> a
> > matter
> > > > > > > > of porting Tomahawk components over to Trinidad than
the
> other
> > way
> > > > > > > > around, I'm guessing, so maybe I'm arguing over semantics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yeah, sorta. The Trinidad podling for instance has already
> > > > > > > *buid-in*support for Facelets. Tomahawk has also some goodies.
> > This
> > > > > > > task (merging) won't be a short one (IMO)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Matt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/Identify_components_to_merge_into_Tomahawk_Shared
>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hey Mike,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > yes that is the goal. but for some reasons user's
won't /
> > can't use
> > > > > > > > > Tomahawk (or MyFaces) in their production. I
think that
> was
> > the reason
> > > > > > > > > for this thread. Creating a custom one on top
of the
> > Trinidad Podling
> > > > > > > > > is ok for me. For the tomahawk stuff, we should
take a
> look
> > at Dojo
> > > > > > > > > ([1]). On the ApacheCon I saw that they have
now "xml
> > namespaces",
> > > > > > > > > means <dojo:wiget ... /> instead of *hacking*
JS.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I know some projects, that are not allowed to
use MyFaces;
> > they stick
> > > > > > > > > with IBM or the RI.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html<http://dojotoolkit.org/%7Edylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger < mkienenb@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Could someone refresh my memory?  Was the
eventual goal
> to
> > merge
> > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and Tomahawk?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If so, I think creating Yet Another Popup
Calendar
> rather
> > than making
> > > > > > > > > > the existing tomahawk popup calendars play
nice with
> > Trinidad is a
> > > > > > > > > > step in the wrong direction.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > However, I could be off-base on the eventual
goal for
> > these two libraries.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Adam Winer < awiner@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > It would definitely be of interest!
 (IMO, it would
> need
> > to
> > > > > > > > > > > handle internationalization and localization
- I'd
> like
> > to keep Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > consistent in this regard.)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Dan Robinson < dannyjrobinson@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Just a quick prompt to see if
there is interest in
> > such a feature.  We may
> > > > > > > > > > > > have capacity to contribute. 
I see this being
> > rendered in 'inaccessible'
> > > > > > > > > > > > mode only, perhaps instead of
the window'ed calendar
> -
> > thoughts.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson <
dannyjrobinson@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ernst.  We're really
trying not to stray
> from
> > Trinidad as a core
> > > > > > > > > > > > > library.  However, I do like
the look of the
> > Tomahawk version, so that
> > > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > make a very good start. 
I guess I'm looking for
> > guidance as to where
> > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > would fit and how it would
be configured - and
> > indeed if people think
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad needs one!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Ernst Fastl <
ernst.fastl@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a calendar
with a JS-Popup mode in the
> > tomahawk-component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > library.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at/myfaces/calendar.jsf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you can use this
one, or at least if you
> > want to implement
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > something
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar in trinidad
learn from this one.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ernst
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson
<dannyjrobinson@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would there be
interest in a 3rd calendar mode
> > whereby it popsup a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JavaScript calendar,
rather than just the
> inline
> > and windowed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > versions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, is there
one out there that people
> would
> > like to see as the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > basis on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which to build?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Danny
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > futher stuff:
> > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > futher stuff:
> > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > futher stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > futher stuff:
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > futher stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>


-- 
Chordiant Software Inc.
www.chordiant.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message