incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Proposal] (re)naming issue
Date Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:42:34 GMT
> > More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext.
> What about TrinidadRealm? ;-)
> No, but why would ExternalContext be better then TrinidadContext?

TrinidadContext *sounds* like only useful for Trinidad.
This *concept* might be nice to be used outside of T.

-Matthias

> Thanx for your patience if this happens to be a stupid question to ask.
>
> Regards,
> Thorsten
>
>
> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: mwessendorf@gmail.com [mailto:mwessendorf@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Matthias Wessendorf
> Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juli 2006 23:49
> An: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: [Proposal] (re)naming issue
>
> Hey,
>
> since we closed ADFFACES-4 it is now time to start the renaming of the
> packages, since ADF is a no no.
>
> ADF-FACES-API
> package
> from
> org.apache.myfaces.adf.**
>
> to
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.**
>
> ADF-FACES-IMPL
> package
> from
> org.apache.myfaces.adfinternal.**
>
> to
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.internal.**
> (note trinidad DOT internal)
>
> More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext.
> Naming them TrinidadContext might not a good solution.
> Note: This class is *not* extending FacesContext.
>
> ExternalContext might be a good name...
> but... as we all know, this is already taken :)
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Mime
View raw message