incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Re: Re: [Proposal] (re)naming issue
Date Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:12:25 GMT
What about

AdfFacesAgent ?

TrinidadAgent sounds strange.



On 7/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> After all is done, I setup a wiki page for a better orientation.
> this thread is just for being clear on names and getting feedback from you guys.
>
> -Matt
>
> On 7/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > clazzes like
> >
> > AdfFacesVariableResolver => TrinidadVariableResolver
> > AdfFacesPhaseListener => TrinidadPhaseListener
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 7/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Yeah,
> > >
> > > why not :)
> > > Thanks for your input Simon. I'll do the renaming of these guys later
> > > to get some more feedback.
> > > -Matt
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/26/06, Simon_Lessard@dmr.ca <Simon_Lessard@dmr.ca> wrote:
> > > > That might be heresy, but I would use TrinidadLogger and create a new
task
> > > > to convert logging to commons-logging and/or log4j rather than a home
made
> > > > JDK 1.4 logger.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Simon Lessard
> > > > Fujitsu Consulting
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew@apache.org>
> > > > Sent by: mwessendorf@gmail.com
> > > > 2006-07-26 16:19
> > > > Please respond to adffaces-dev
> > > >
> > > >         To:     adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >         cc:
> > > >         Subject:        Re: Re: Re: [Proposal] (re)naming issue
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > folks,
> > > >
> > > > more
> > > > AdfFacesFilter => RequestFilter ?
> > > >
> > > > but what with:
> > > > ADFLogger
> > > > ADFLoggerRecord
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > > On 7/24/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/24/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > What with
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > <faceletHandlerClass>org.apache.myfaces.adfinternal.facelets.AdfComponentHandler</faceletHandlerClass>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am fine with TrinidadComponentHandler, b/c this is *specific*
to T.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 7/20/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > For class names, I'm thinking that:
> > > > > > > >   AdfFacesContext -> RequestContext, or maybe LifecycleContext
> > > > > > > >   AdfRenderingContext -> RenderingContext
> > > > > > > > (the latter is currently a private-ish internal class,
but I think
> > > > > > > > we should make it public at some point.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I like that RequestContext and RenderingContext thing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I also wish we could keep the "internal" part of the
package;  I'd
> > > > > > > > rather have:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > org.apache.myfacesinternal.trinidad
> > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ok.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any other opinion ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ... than:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.internal
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Doing it "without the dot" forces all the internal
code
> > > > > > > > into an entirely different directory structure, which
is
> > > > > > > > handy for things like doc + inclusion rules - you
don't
> > > > > > > > have to specify exclusion rules, just inclusion.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/20/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > ADF-FACES-API
> > > > > > > > > > package
> > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.adf.**
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.**
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ADF-FACES-IMPL
> > > > > > > > > > package
> > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.adfinternal.**
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.internal.**
> > > > > > > > > > (note trinidad DOT internal)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since nobody seams to have a problem with the
package
> > > > suggestion, I think we
> > > > > > > > > should move on on this task, ok ?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > o.a.m.trinidad is also fine. Tobago does the
same.
> > > > > > > > > they use also the myfaces specific namespace.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Only tomahawk doesn't :)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.custom
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > but that is from ooooooooold days. Hard to change
:)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext.
> > > > > > > > > > Naming them TrinidadContext might not a
good solution.
> > > > > > > > > > Note: This class is *not* extending FacesContext.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ExternalContext might be a good name...
> > > > > > > > > > but... as we all know, this is already taken
:)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Mime
View raw message