From adffaces-dev-return-1447-apmail-incubator-adffaces-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Oct 17 01:24:20 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 33444 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2006 01:24:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2006 01:24:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 73353 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2006 01:24:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-adffaces-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73333 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2006 01:24:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact adffaces-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73306 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2006 01:24:18 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:24:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of awiner@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.169] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:24:17 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so1178929uge for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:23:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=prnIyL5FM9GGU+vUaz7BfmcuHntseEeKgJ0vy2eX1H2KxNwhGu7ss/TvdoX7TvHbiFE85T7goKFsS4C5ClsoNiA4HYkMMWdwo0gUhX264je7uSsdZvsAAlVvpAwAouq7c8LACq0QpKQWTvq76gQUZcmUMOQJ5fuaOsg679o6tag= Received: by 10.66.252.4 with SMTP id z4mr1230351ugh; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.102.2 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6dac79b90610161823x77c01ab6kd015e08d12a07c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:23:55 -0700 From: "Adam Winer" To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] update unsupported-agent tag for PDA In-Reply-To: <00cc01c6f156$404ff060$84ae1990@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_168751_20570709.1161048235482" References: <00cc01c6f156$404ff060$84ae1990@us.oracle.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_168751_20570709.1161048235482 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Absolutely. (FWIW, something this obviously just a bug with only one possible resolution, I don't think we really need an e-mail thread - a JIRA issue will do fine.) -- Adam On 10/16/06, Piyush Hari wrote: > > Hello, > > The unsupported-agent tag generated in faces-config.xml indicates which > agents DON'T support the component.This information isn't used at > runtime--rather, it's a hint to JDeveloper which components to show/hide in > the component palette you can drag and drop from. For example, chooseColor > has an unsupported-agent that includes pda. So , chooseColor will not appear > in Jdev when building a PDA app. > > We have to make sure to update the unsupported-agent values in Trinidad to > reflect our current state. > > Therefore, I propose updating the unsupported-agent tags in Trinidad for > PDAs. > > Regards, > Piyush Hari > ------=_Part_168751_20570709.1161048235482--