incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin van den Bemt <mll...@mvdb.net>
Subject Re: [vote] release of plugins (1.0.0-incubating)
Date Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:31:04 GMT
Sweet :)

Mvgr,
Martin

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Iona's Daniel Kulp gave me a hint on the maven list, regarding the javadoc.
> 
> a very nice plugin:
> In the "maven-plugin-parent" pom, you can add the following snippet, then
> you can actually REMOVE the META-INF/LICENSE and
> META-INF/INCUBATOR_NOTICE.txt files from your source tree.  (You can
> optionally remove the NOTICE files as well as this will create new ones
> based
> on the dependencies.   However, if the NOTICE file is left, it will use it
> instead of creating a new one.)
> 
> <plugin>
>   <artifactId>maven-remote-resources-plugin</artifactId>
>   <version>1.0-alpha-2</version>
>   <executions>
>       <execution>
>           <goals>
>               <goal>process</goal>
>           </goals>
>           <configuration>
>               <resourceBundles>
> <resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-jar-resource-bundle:1.1</resourceBundle>
> <resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-incubator-disclaimer-resource-bundle:1.0</resourceBundle>
> 
>               </resourceBundles>
>               <properties>
>                   <addLicense>true</addLicense>
>                   <preProjectText>Put the Oracle thing here in
> a cdata section type of thing.
>                   </preProjectText>
>               </properties>
>           </configuration>
>       </execution>
>   </executions>
> </plugin>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I already *replaced* the stuff in the stage.
> So now, all your concerns are fixed (the last was the javadoc-jar)
> 
> -M
> 
> On 2/21/07, Martin van den Bemt <mllist@mvdb.net> wrote:
>> The javadoc things sucks.. We probably can get it work (to add notice,
>> etc), but at a high cost I
>> think (at least I couldn't get the simplest solution working, which is
>> adding files to
>> src/main/javadoc) (another note : for once I didn't look at the
>> sourcecode how stuff works).
>>
>> So from me +1 (I didn't check every single artifact, just a
>> "snapshot") of what was in the staging
>> environment.
>>
>> And about the vote : you have to start it on general :) Just do a VOTE
>> RESULT first here (specify
>> who voted, if the person is on the PPMC or/and on the Incubator PMC
>> (and also result the votes of
>> people who don't have a binding vote (since they are worth something).
>>
>> If Craig also casts his vote and one other person (like Robert) we can
>> really release this baby and
>> start with releasing the core :)
>>
>> Yeeha :)
>>
>> Mvgr,
>> Martin
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > btw. the javadoc jar issue is triggered by a bug inside of the plugin.
>> >
>> > Martin,
>> > do you bring the vote up to general@i.a.o, once you voted +1 :)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Matthias
>> >
>> > On 2/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> Ok, Martin I fixed those things
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage/
>> >>
>> >> Once we get the approval from the Incubator PMC guys, I'd like to
>> >> test/use this tool for doing the copy:
>> >>
>> >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Repository+Tools
>> >>
>> >> -Matthias
>> >>
>> >> On 2/19/07, Martin van den Bemt <mllist@mvdb.net> wrote:
>> >> > Sorry for the delay (board report time)..
>> >> >
>> >> > - Source jar contains target directory (probably need to do an
>> >> exclude of that specifically)
>> >> > - Source jar src/site don't contain licenses
>> >> > - Javadoc jar don't contain any notices and license (since javadoc
>> >> is generated the html doesn't
>> >> > need apache headers)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Not blocking :
>> >> >
>> >> > In the MANIFEST.MF file I am missing the version of the plugin (for
>> >> the trinidad core a lot more
>> >> > important) and also the build version is 1.5. Don't know if that is
>> >> the target / needed ? (afaik
>> >> > trinidad core is 1.5)
>> >> >
>> >> > If you fix the source and javadoc I am +1 :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Sorry for the tough crowd. On the other hand : if you get it right
>> >> once, you should be able to get
>> >> > it right everywhere :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Mvgr,
>> >> > Martin
>> >> >
>> >> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> >> > > Hi,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I finally managed to get some release artifacts published to a
>> "stage
>> >> > > repo". I used my private Apache account for that ([1]).
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Please take a look at the "1.0.0-incubating" artifacts and vote
>> if we
>> >> > > should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval
>> >> > >
>> >> > > ------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
>> >> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> >> > > [ ] +0
>> >> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>> >> released,
>> >> > >         and why..............
>> >> > > ------------------------------------------------
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> > > Matthias
>> >> > >
>> >> > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage/
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Matthias Wessendorf
>> >> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>> >>
>> >> further stuff:
>> >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message