incubator-photark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Suggestion to go for a higher version of SLF4J
Date Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:25:32 GMT
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Subash Chaturanga <subashsdm@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Subash Chaturanga <subashsdm@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi devs,
>> >
>> > When I wrote a test class for Generic Face Recognition I got the
>> following
>> > Exception in runtime,
>> > *Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access
>> > field org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder.SINGLETON from class
>> > org.slf4j.LoggerFactory*
>> >
>> > This is because, the slf4j-api distribution having different
>> implementations
>> > of StaticLoggerBinder  to one in the slf4j implementation JARs. So to
>> skip
>> > this and gt this done, we need to include the slfj4 -api dependency as
>> well.
>> > And also I saw in a forum saying this doesn't work for versions below
>> 1.5.5
>> > or 6.
>> > So I tried by having dependencies of the version 1.5.8 in both api and
>> impl
>> > of slf4j (having priority to the API ) and it worked, but didn't worked
>> for
>> > 1.5.3 (which we currently have) and trunk also builds with the new pom.
>> >
>> >        <dependency>
>> >         <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
>> >         <artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
>> >         <version>1.5.8</version>
>> >       </dependency>
>> >
>> > <dependency>
>> >  <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
>> >  <artifactId>slf4j-log4j12</artifactId>
>> >  <version>1.5.8</version>
>> > </dependency>
>> >
>> >  So Shall we go ahead with 1.5.8 ?  WDYT ?
>>
>> How about we move to the latest one, which is 1.6.1 ?
>
>
> Hi Luciano, I am getting some Exceptions of NoSuchMethodError from face4j in
> 1.6.1 and 1.6.0(but i don't know the reason). There is no version called
> 1.5.9.
> But 1.5.8 works fine. WDYT?
>
>

+1 then.


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message