incubator-stonehenge-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew (Drew) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-21) Having a unified configuration system
Date Fri, 08 May 2009 03:35:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12707221#action_12707221
] 

Andrew (Drew) commented on STONEHENGE-21:
-----------------------------------------

Hi Shankar,
I mean run four scenarios simultaneously having different configurations and as many machines
as it takes - but from one database.
I do not see how the CLIENTTOBS OR BSTOOPS can handle more than one row without adding a column
for the ClientName and ServerName. 

Like I said I am not a DB guy so please tell me how to you set those tables (CLIENTTOBS OR
BSTOOPS  )where you have two clients at the same time  pointing to different BS and Two BS
talking to different OPS?





> Having a unified configuration system
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STONEHENGE-21
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
>             Project: Stonehenge
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: S.Uthaiyashankar
>             Fix For: M2
>
>
> Currently, .NET Services and PHP/WSAS Services are configured differently. .NET uses
file based configuration and PHP/WSAS uses database configurations. We have to find a common
mechanism to store the configurations. One option is to have a configuration service and then
all the other services request endpoint details from configuration service. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message