incubator-stonehenge-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Dewey (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-21) Having a unified configuration system
Date Tue, 19 May 2009 19:14:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12710835#action_12710835
] 

Ben Dewey commented on STONEHENGE-21:
-------------------------------------

I was in the process of mocking a potential .NET Config Service Contract based on PHP and
I noticed that the PHP config service has the following actions.

- OPSConfigRequest
- ActiveDB
- GetActiveDB
- BSConfigRequest
- ClientToBS
- ServiceLocation
- GetClientToBSConnections
- BSToOPS
- DBConfig
- GetServiceLocations
- GetBSToOPSConnections
- ClientConfigRequest
- GetDBConfigs

When I was navigating the site with TCPMon enabled the only actions that got invoked were


- ClientConfigRequest
- BSConfigRequest

Are any other actions actually being used in production?  Should the .NET Client implement
all these actions, or just the active ones?

> Having a unified configuration system
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STONEHENGE-21
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
>             Project: Stonehenge
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: S.Uthaiyashankar
>             Fix For: M2
>
>
> Currently, .NET Services and PHP/WSAS Services are configured differently. .NET uses
file based configuration and PHP/WSAS uses database configurations. We have to find a common
mechanism to store the configurations. One option is to have a configuration service and then
all the other services request endpoint details from configuration service. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message