incubator-stonehenge-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Avantika Agrawal (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-88) Use SEC value to remove unnecessary bindings in .NET
Date Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:27:14 GMT


Avantika Agrawal updated STONEHENGE-88:

    Attachment: Stonehenge-88-I.patch

This patch overloads some methods in BasicClient so that clients can be created with urls
specified in the database.
This means that we no longer need to store the URLs in the app.config - we can simply store
generic basic/secure bindings.

> Use SEC value to remove unnecessary bindings in .NET
> ----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: STONEHENGE-88
>                 URL:
>             Project: Stonehenge
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Avantika Agrawal
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: Stonehenge-88-I.patch
> It would be nice to use the SEC value from the database with a single custom binding
(for all the different stacks), rather than have bindngs for each stack individually. This
would make the code easier to follow, as well. 
> There are several ways we could approach this problem:
> 1 - Have a basic and a sec binding in the App.config files and select between the two
of these uses the boolean SEC value specified in the SERVICE table. This means that the implementations
have to use only these bindings - no options
> 2 - Implementations can use whatever binding they want as long as its in the Config file.
This means that the SEC value will be a string and it will be used to select between the different
bindings. This allows for more than two bindings - there can be custom bindings for certain
stacks, but this may introduce the same complexity that we currently have.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message