jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (OAK-781) Clarify / fix effects of MISSING_NODE as base state of NodeBuilder
Date Fri, 24 May 2013 22:28:22 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Michael Dürig updated OAK-781:

    Attachment: OAK-781-2.patch

OAK-781-2.patch is an attempt in implementing [Jukka's proposal | https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-781?focusedCommentId=13646640&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13646640]
of using a separate abstraction for tracking connectedness. [~jukkaz] please have a look when
you come around to it.
> Clarify / fix effects of MISSING_NODE as base state of NodeBuilder
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: OAK-781
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-781
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>         Attachments: 0001-OAK-781-Clarify-fix-effects-of-MISSING_NODE-as-base-.patch,
memorynodebuilder-1.png, memorynodebuilder-2.png, OAK-781-2.patch, OAK-781.patch
> Having a {{MISSING_NODE}} respectively a node state that returns false for its {{exists}}
method as a base state of a node builder results in undefined behaviour. We need to clarify
how to handle such cases for resolving OAK-766.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message