jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-781) Clarify / fix effects of MISSING_NODE as base state of NodeBuilder
Date Tue, 28 May 2013 19:55:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13668600#comment-13668600
] 

Michael Dürig commented on OAK-781:
-----------------------------------

Thanks for the review. I applied the patch at revision 1487086 taking the first two bullet
points into consideration. I will follow up re. the last two bullet points in separate comments.

                
> Clarify / fix effects of MISSING_NODE as base state of NodeBuilder
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-781
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-781
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>         Attachments: 0001-OAK-781-Clarify-fix-effects-of-MISSING_NODE-as-base-.patch,
memorynodebuilder-1.png, memorynodebuilder-2.png, OAK-781-2.patch, OAK-781.patch
>
>
> Having a {{MISSING_NODE}} respectively a node state that returns false for its {{exists}}
method as a base state of a node builder results in undefined behaviour. We need to clarify
how to handle such cases for resolving OAK-766.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message