jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-17) Modularisation and configuration concept
Date Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:46:46 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13939142#comment-13939142
] 

Michael Dürig commented on OAK-17:
----------------------------------

[~chetanm], for completeness sake, could you add a link to your work here?

> Modularisation and configuration concept
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-17
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-17
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: core, jcr
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>            Assignee: Tobias Bocanegra
>             Fix For: 0.19
>
>
> We need to come up with a concept for modularisation and configuration. There is some
initial discussion on the list [1]. While we need to make sure that we are interoperable with
OSGi, I don't think we should use OSGi itself for the lower granular pieces. That is, for
certain subsystems of oak-jcr or oak-core for example. Still we need a way for handling dependencies
between and configuration of implementation classes. In the case of oak-jcr there is the GlobalContext
class. This is basically poor man's dependency injection and I'd like to get rid of it as
soon as we have a better solution. What I'd like to have on that level is compile time dependency
injection such that we get loose coupling between implementation classes but don't get the
additional complexity from run time dependency injection (aka OSGi).
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/hpssa4r6brlt5cwa



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message