jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefan Egli (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-2546) allow configuring subcaches of documentnodestore individually
Date Thu, 12 Mar 2015 21:12:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14359426#comment-14359426

Stefan Egli commented on OAK-2546:

Created follow-up idea 'dynamic cache allocation' in OAK-2622

> allow configuring subcaches of documentnodestore individually
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: OAK-2546
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2546
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mongomk
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.11, 1.1.6
>            Reporter: Stefan Egli
>            Assignee: Marcel Reutegger
>             Fix For: 1.0.12, 1.1.7
> Currently there's one config for the DocumentNodeStore's (actually DocumentMk) caches
(Documents, Diff, DocChildren, NodeChildren, NodeState) as a whole, and it distributes to
each of those subcaches in a [hard-coded way|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/document/DocumentMK.java#L732].
It would be good to be able to configure the individual sub-caches individually (be it in
percentage or absolute)
> The reason I bring this up is where I think it might be useful to try out giving the
NodeChildren relatively more cache as it turned out during a heavy-load test that observation
queues were starting to grow at the same point in time when the NodeChildren cache started
to perform badly. While the problem there is relative bad performance of one or a few observation
listeners, it could nevertheless help bridge a situation when the NodeChildren cache contains
a longer 'history' so that the slow listener could catch up.
> PS: Leaving it up to discussion as to whether this goes into 1.0 branch or not

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message