jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thomas Mueller (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-2902) Code coverage
Date Wed, 03 Jun 2015 07:41:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14570435#comment-14570435
] 

Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-2902:
-------------------------------------

The INFRA-9709 issue is in the state "Waiting for infra" since one week, without comment.
Maybe the infra team is completely overloaded, or they don't use Jira in a sensible way, because
there are tons of issues in this state.

> Code coverage
> -------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-2902
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2902
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>            Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>              Labels: technical_debt
>             Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> We should have automated code coverage results, and then decide upon minimum numbers
we want to achieve (for example, initially 100% package or class coverage). Once we reached
the goal, we can increase the minimum coverage on a module-by-module basis.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message