jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-3529) NodeStore API should expose an Instance ID
Date Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:23:11 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15046694#comment-15046694

Michael Dürig commented on OAK-3529:

Looks good re. {{Clusterable}}. Maybe [~mreutegg] should have a quick look re. the DocumentMK

I'm not too happy with the {{getInstanceId()}} methods on the builder though. Are those really
necessary? After all, users of those builders usually pass the node store along so they have
access to the instance id already. 

> NodeStore API should expose an Instance ID
> ------------------------------------------
>                 Key: OAK-3529
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3529
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Davide Giannella
>            Assignee: Davide Giannella
>             Fix For: 1.4
>         Attachments: OAK-3529-1.patch, OAK-3529-2.patch, OAK-3529-3.patch
> For better leveraging cluster oriented algorithm: discovery, atomic
> operations; it would be very helpful if the NodeStore could expose a
> unique instance id.
> This can be the same as a cluster ID.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message