[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15732385#comment-15732385
]
Vikas Saurabh edited comment on OAK-3976 at 12/8/16 2:38 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Good point. But, as you said, we'd probably be ok with minor accuracy losses. I avoided {{+=paths.length}}
(in one step higher level modified method) for that reason though.
was (Author: catholicon):
Good point. But, as you said, we'd probably be ok with minor accuracy losses. I avoided {{+=paths.length}}
for that reason though.
> journal should support large(r) entries
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3976
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3976
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentmk
> Affects Versions: 1.3.14
> Reporter: Stefan Egli
> Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
> Fix For: 1.6, 1.5.16
>
>
> Journal entries are created in the background write. Normally this happens every second.
If for some reason there is a large delay between two background writes, the number of pending
changes can also accumulate. Which can result in (arbitrary) large single journal entries
(ie with large {{_c}} property).
> This can cause multiple problems down the road:
> * journal gc at this point loads 450 entries - and if some are large this can result
in a very large memory consumption during gc (which can cause severe stability problems for
the VM, if not OOM etc). This should be fixed with OAK-3001 (where we only get the id, thus
do not care how big {{_c}} is)
> * before OAK-3001 is done (which is currently scheduled after 1.4) what we can do is
reduce the delete batch size (OAK-3975)
> * background reads however also read the journal entries and even if OAK-3001/OAK-3975
are implemented the background read can still cause large memory consumption. So we need to
improve this one way or another.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
|