jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-7570) [DirectBinaryAccess][DISCUSS] How to access HttpBlobProvider from oak-jcr
Date Wed, 11 Jul 2018 07:41:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16539664#comment-16539664
] 

Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7570:
---------------------------------------

bq. Some questions regarding the whiteboard approach: How do you know this is the one from
the BlobStore/DataStore used by the NodeStore?

That's the beauty of it. The oak-jcr layer doesn't need to know where it comes from. Loose
coupling gives you the freedom to combine components in different ways.

bq. Can this be used to add a HttpBlobProvider in an OSGi context at runtime, outside Oak?
If yes, is this something that should be allowed?

I think this is no different from registering a NodeStore or BlobStore. If this is a concern,
then resolving bundles that want to make use of those interfaces can be restricted with an
OSGi ResolverHook.

> [DirectBinaryAccess][DISCUSS] How to access HttpBlobProvider from oak-jcr
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-7570
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7570
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Technical task
>          Components: jcr
>            Reporter: Matt Ryan
>            Assignee: Matt Ryan
>            Priority: Major
>
> Open discussion related to OAK-7569:
> The [original pull request|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/88] proposes
changes to oak-api, oak-segment-tar, oak-store-document, oak-core, and oak-jcr as well as
oak-blob-plugins, oak-blob-cloud, and oak-blob-azure.  Would it be possible / better to keep
the changes local to the oak-blob-* bundles and avoid making changes throughout the stack?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message