jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "angela (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-8045) Allow for ranking being specified with UserAuthenticatonFactory implementations
Date Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:02:03 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16807781#comment-16807781

angela commented on OAK-8045:

[~stillalex], proposed fix and a test-case attached and i would appreciate if you had time
to review it. i reordered the parameters for bind/unbind putting the {{ServiceReference}}
first for the simple reason that the sling-osgi-testing bundle expects this order. according
to [~cziegeler] that will also work in a real world setup, where no specific order is mandated
by the specification.

> Allow for ranking being specified with UserAuthenticatonFactory implementations
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: OAK-8045
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8045
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core, security-spi
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: angela
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: OAK-8045.patch
> Currently the {{SecurityProviderRegistration}} lists {{UserAuthenticationFactory}} implementions
according to the order they are bound. While other parts of the security setup (e.g. AuthorizationConfiguration)
allow for an explicit ranking to be specified this option is missing with {{UserAuthenticationFactory}}
as reported in the following thread on jackrabbit-users: https://markmail.org/message/hieqxfdvsadi3lyr
> [~stillalex], wdyt?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message