jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mohit Kataria (Jira)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-9122) Bring IndexDefinitionBuilder's implementation in oak-search at par with the one in oak-lucene and remove the oak-lucene implementation
Date Mon, 29 Jun 2020 06:51:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147583#comment-17147583
] 

Mohit Kataria commented on OAK-9122:
------------------------------------

Issue resolved:

[http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1879319]

> Bring IndexDefinitionBuilder's implementation in oak-search at par with the one in oak-lucene
and remove the oak-lucene implementation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-9122
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9122
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mohit Kataria
>            Assignee: Mohit Kataria
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently oak have two IndexDefinitionBuilder implementation one in oak-search and other
in oak-lucene.
> We want one implementation of IndexDefinitionBuilder  so that it can be extended to
have multiple implementations .e.g. lucene and elastic.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Mime
View raw message