jakarta-bsf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.0 RC1
Date Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:37:16 GMT
Top posting a quick question: is this vote for the 3.0 m2 repo
artifacts still active? If it is, I intend to take a look in the next
day or two.

-Rahul


On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:40 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:40 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:55 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 28/10/2009, Rony G. Flatscher <Rony.Flatscher@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  ant elder wrote:
>>>>  > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:04 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>  >
>>>>  >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:13 PM, sebb AT ASF<sebb@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0 RC1 release.
>>>>  >>> The artifacts are available at:
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.0-RC1/
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>> and the an SVN tag is at:
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-rc1/
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>> S///
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>  >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>>>  >>> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  >> Whats there looks good, +1
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >> There's no Maven staging repo, could that be added to this vote?
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>   ...ant
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >>
>>>>  >
>>>>  > We never did sort out the maven artifacts of for the 1.0 release,
>>>>  > which means projects using maven cant use the 1.0 release. I did put
>>>>  > some artifacts up at
>>>>  > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-rc1/maven/ during the
>>>>  > release vote, could we consider them part of the 1.0 release vote
or
>>>>  > should we have another vote to release them? There was a question
>>>>  > about no license header on one of the generated pom.xml files, but
i'm
>>>>  > not sure how to fix that easily and it doesn't seem like a release
>>>>  > blocker to me.
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>
>>> Surely the header can just be added to the file before it is deployed?
>>>
>>
>> Fair point, ok I'll do that, and I think I call a vote on releasing
>> them just to make sure its all clean and tidy.
>>
>>   ...ant
>>
>
> Ok that is done now, the staging repo is the same as before
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-rc1/maven/ which is the one
> from earlier with the only change being the bsf-all jar generated
> pom.xml now has an AL header and is resigned.
>
> Please confirm with a +1 to include these in the 3.0 release.
>
> +1 from me.
>
>   ...ant
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message