jakarta-site-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From d..@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: jakarta-site2/docs/site mail.html
Date Wed, 11 Jul 2001 04:23:43 GMT
dfs         01/07/10 21:23:43

  Modified:    xdocs/site mail.xml
               docs/site mail.html
  Log:
  Added blurb indicating that Reply-To debates should not be brought up
  on mailing lists with pointers to opposing viewpoints.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.16      +12 -1     jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/mail.xml
  
  Index: mail.xml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/mail.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.15
  retrieving revision 1.16
  diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16
  --- mail.xml	2001/03/02 19:19:12	1.15
  +++ mail.xml	2001/07/11 04:23:41	1.16
  @@ -97,7 +97,18 @@
   and not to the original author directly. The reason is because it helps
   facilitate discussion on the list for everyone to benefit from. Be careful 
   of this as sometimes you may intend to reply to a message directly to someone 
  -instead of the entire list. 
  +instead of the entire list.
  +<em>
  +The appropriate contents of the Reply-To header is an age-old debate that
  +should not be brought up on the mailing lists.  You can
  +examine opposing points of view
  +<a href="http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html">condemning</a>
  +our convention and 
  +<a href="http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml">
  +condoning</a> 
  +it.  Bringing this up for debate on a mailing list will add nothing
  +new and is considered off-topic.
  +</em>
   </p>
   
   <p>
  
  
  
  1.34      +12 -1     jakarta-site2/docs/site/mail.html
  
  Index: mail.html
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/docs/site/mail.html,v
  retrieving revision 1.33
  retrieving revision 1.34
  diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34
  --- mail.html	2001/07/10 02:06:54	1.33
  +++ mail.html	2001/07/11 04:23:42	1.34
  @@ -210,7 +210,18 @@
   and not to the original author directly. The reason is because it helps
   facilitate discussion on the list for everyone to benefit from. Be careful 
   of this as sometimes you may intend to reply to a message directly to someone 
  -instead of the entire list. 
  +instead of the entire list.
  +<em>
  +The appropriate contents of the Reply-To header is an age-old debate that
  +should not be brought up on the mailing lists.  You can
  +examine opposing points of view
  +<a href="http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html">condemning</a>
  +our convention and 
  +<a href="http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml">
  +condoning</a> 
  +it.  Bringing this up for debate on a mailing list will add nothing
  +new and is considered off-topic.
  +</em>
   </p>
                                                   <p>
   <strong>
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message