james-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bernd Fondermann <bf_...@brainlounge.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release descriptions
Date Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:36:53 GMT
Danny Angus wrote:
> On 11/16/06, Bernd Fondermann <bf_jak@brainlounge.de> wrote:
>> But why are we having a public PMC vote on general@ regarding a James
>> Server issue?
> Because we are the Project Management Commitee, and it is our
> responsibility to resolve issues like these. There is confusion
> regarding what version number will be "next" for James, the PMC should
> resolve that confusion.

Of course, fine. But I was surprised not to see this vote on private@ or 
Anyway, it is good to have it in public though.

>> This my vote is only binding for James Server releases.
>> jSPF for example may establish another versioning scheme.
> If this is agreed and understood by a majority of people working on
> jSPF then the PMC is likely not to have any interest.



View raw message