james-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bernd Fondermann <bf_...@brainlounge.de>
Subject Re: users@ Moderation
Date Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:32:26 GMT
Ironically, I had to moderate Serge's post ;-)

Generally, I think we should keep moderating, I find it is done rather 
quick using gmail. I'd even take one or two more lists if someone needs 
a rest...


Serge Knystautas wrote:
> Danny Angus wrote:
>> Apparently we've won a million dollars. :-(
>> But seriously this is getting ridiculous, the users list gets more
>> spam than messages. roughly one message per seven spam. for the
>> moderation requests I think there are probably 100+ spam per genuine
>> moderation issue.
>> I've got to the point where I don't bother to action users@
>> moderations, and I reckon that I get 99+% right by just ignoring them.
>> This makes the moderation email pretty pointless.
>> Any suggestions as to what we could do about it, sensible ones only
>> we're not about to get apache infrastructure to change the tools they
>> use, not unless we're prepared to do the admin, and I'm figuring that
>> if we don't have the resources to progress James at the rate we want
>> we certainly don't have the resources for any of that kind of thing.
> We could turn off moderation and require you to be subscribed.  I 
> believe there are other ASF project mailing lists that have done this.

View raw message