james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthew Pangaro" <mpang...@lokitech.com>
Subject Re: JAMES Proposal.
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2001 16:37:40 GMT
I think Serge was talking about moving James back to straight JDBC code in
order to improve performance. I've not seen any chat about the other
features, but I'd say if you've got an itch, feel free to start
scratching... ;-)
Matt Pangaro
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ram C" <ram_c@mybc.com>
To: <james-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: JAMES Proposal.


> I have a few questions on what is planned for JAMES...
>
> 1) Will 'town' still be used ?(or) is there any plans to use
Turbine/Torque/Peer
> for the OR mapping ? (or) any plans on going back to direct JDBC?
>
> 2) Any plans to implement a Auto Vacation Notification ?
>
> 3) Any plans to implement a custom e-mail blocking for each user ?



Mime
View raw message