james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Harmeet Bedi" <hb...@yahoo.com>
Subject having separate blocks for protocol servers
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2001 16:53:52 GMT
I am planning to add different xinfo files for protocol servers in the next
few days. Please let me know if there are some issues or concerns.
Basically protocol servers(POP, SMTP, NNTP, IMPA) would be loaded via
assembly.xml not via James.

- This is more flexible
- Will clean james/James.java
- Allow more than one protocol server instance to exist for each protocol.
For example there could be POP3 available via Plain Socket and TLS. There
are many advantages to this, for example one could put up a firewall and
expose only the TLS POP3 outside.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harmeet Bedi" <hbedi@yahoo.com>
To: <james-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:35 AM
Subject: Re: proposal to have rfclist folder under docs in cvs.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Donald" <donaldp@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:34 AM
> > BTW the servers are already Blocks as they extend AbstractService which
> > a block ;) They just need config stuff applied to them and dependency
> > wiring via .xinfo ;)
> I'll put this in my todo, unless someone objects or does it before me.
> Should be straight foward and useful - would help add newer protocols
> with mulitple instance of already existing protocols.
> Harmeet

Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

View raw message