james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <dona...@apache.org>
Subject Re: having separate blocks for protocol servers
Date Thu, 19 Apr 2001 00:29:28 GMT
At 09:53  18/4/01 -0700, Harmeet Bedi wrote:
>I am planning to add different xinfo files for protocol servers in the next
>few days. Please let me know if there are some issues or concerns.
>Basically protocol servers(POP, SMTP, NNTP, IMPA) would be loaded via
>assembly.xml not via James.
>
>- This is more flexible
>- Will clean james/James.java
>- Allow more than one protocol server instance to exist for each protocol.
>For example there could be POP3 available via Plain Socket and TLS. There
>are many advantages to this, for example one could put up a firewall and
>expose only the TLS POP3 outside.

Yeehaw !

Go for it ;)

Cheers,

Pete

*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |
*-----------------------------------------------------*


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message