james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Danny Angus" <da...@apache.org>
Subject RE: Mailet API was RE: Finer Logging Control for Mailets/Matchers
Date Sat, 08 Jun 2002 22:04:42 GMT

> I'll hope that you have a simple API like :
>    MailAction mailRequest(MailItem mailItem) throw MailRequestException;

's funny you should say that, 'cos I'd like to hear your opinion on this..

two alternatives;

a) Mail service(Mail mail) throws MailetException;


b) void service(Mail mail) throws MailetException;

the difference being that a returns a Mail which continues through the
processing, _as__if_ the Mail had been passed by value, and b alters the
existing message as if it had been passed by refrence (which of course it

Now I did a lot of C programming, where the refrence approach was the
conventional one, but in Java the by-value analogy seems to be the expected

the argument in favour of b is that it is more efficient, and actually
constrains processors to acting in a linear fashion, by not allowing new
Mails to be returned.

Alternatively it might be argued (perhaps by me ;-) that a is the more
expected/acceptable signature and that anyway there is nothing stopping a
mailet from replacing the value of Mail mail with a new Mail anyway.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

View raw message