james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Benett <char...@benett1.demon.co.uk>
Subject Re: Next question.. (was: Should we remove ant? )
Date Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:10:40 GMT
If there is an Apache option, I think we should take it in preference to 
non-Apache options. And the Avalon site looks very similar to Danny's 
Maven'd James site.

Charles


Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> I would propose Apache Forrest instead...
> The site would be updated automatically from CVS for you, and is 
> completely skinnable.
> 
> Here is the last manually updated Forrest site:
> http://xml.apache.org/forrest/
> 
> Here is the hourly updated from CVS Forrest site:
> http://www.krysalis.org/forrest/
> 
> The Avalon site is done by a Forrest subsystem:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/
> 
> 
> Danny Angus wrote:
> 
>> Ok,
>>
>> The next question is should we use Maven to build the site..?
>> I have used Maven to build a sample of the James site (didn't config 
>> all the
>> developers) in my home dir, without changing any of the source of the 
>> docs,
>> what do we think?
>>
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/~danny/
>>
>>
>> d.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Danny Angus wrote:
>>>
>>>> Let me clarify..
>>>>
>>>> I think we should remove ant binaries from cvs, I'm totally cool with
>>>> modifying & keeping the script, then "ant" or "build" will do the 
>>>> thing.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>> <mailto:james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message