james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicola...@apache.org>
Subject Re: IMAP - New CVS Repository
Date Sat, 24 Aug 2002 16:03:32 GMT

Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2002 06:55:27 -0400, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
> 
>>Stephan Schiessling wrote:
>>
>>>Danny Angus wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sascha,
>>>>Its up to you of course, but I'm not sure that forking the code would
>>>>be a good idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, a code fork is a bad idea, but this is not a code fork. The
>>>separate CVS repository was my idea and I still think it is a good
>>>idea.
>>>The code, which goes into official IMAP repository must be reviewed by
>>>a commiter and it has to be stable.
>>>I generally support this model, because it has advantages, but it
>>>blocks the current development for IMAP.
>>
>>If you really really really have your mind fixed on having a separate
>>repository, I can set you one up @ krysalis.org where you can put the
>>code with the Apache license.
>>
>>I would guarantee that it's a temporary solution before committing it
>>into James without needing full commit access right away.
> 
>  
> I'll -1 it on krysalis.  There is no good reason to fork this project
> because someone is impatient that they are not a committer yet.

IT's not "fork", it's just the possibility to foster Krysalis as an 
Apache-alley... but of course, you don't see it this way...

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message