james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Danny Angus" <da...@apache.org>
Subject RE: Latest diffs, source code
Date Sun, 20 Oct 2002 08:37:25 GMT
I remember discussing it, parseing a message into its MIME components is intensive work (I've
written a MIME parser) and should be deferred until it is needed, then not repeated.

d.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:sergek@lokitech.com]
> Sent: 20 October 2002 00:00
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Latest diffs, source code
> 
> 
> Yes, you're wrong.  The whole point of the class (and related ones) is to
> avoid loading and parsing the message into memory.  This improved
> performance by an order of magnitude back when it was added.
> 
> Serge Knystautas
> Loki Technologies
> http://www.lokitech.com/
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harmeet Bedi" <harmeet@kodemuse.com>
> To: "James Developers List" <james-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 9:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Latest diffs, source code
> 
> 
> > I am suggesting that we keep the byte array in memory for the processing
> of
> > message.
> >
> > Isn't this already done ? I thought the mailets end up reading 
> the entire
> > mime message, hence loading the data in at least once. Could be 
> wrong, but
> I
> > thought there were places that forced entire message load.
> >
> > Leveraging this info we could remove the temp file. However I admit, it
> has
> > been a long time since I profiled James.
> >
> > Harmeet
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message