james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Danny Angus" <da...@apache.org>
Subject RE: Supporting multiple "root processor"s in James 1.3?
Date Sun, 20 Apr 2003 18:54:26 GMT
+1 nice idea Noel, have several different roots, but shared error/spam/remote delivery

d.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: 20 April 2003 17:46
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Supporting multiple "root processor"s in James 1.3?
> 
> 
> > > The cleanest solution would be to have a second "root processor",
> > > defined specifically to deal with mail queued in the error repository.
> 
> > No, you just need an option to specify which processor to 
> inject the mail
> > into, e.g., the "transport" processor.
> 
> In fact, we could add an optional configuration element to the smtp server
> block indicating which processor to consider the "root".  That 
> would provide
> additional flexibility when we allow multiple smtp server blocks listening
> on different bind addresses.
> 
> 	--- Noel
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message