james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Serge Knystautas <ser...@lokitech.com>
Subject Re: IMAP Development Pointers
Date Fri, 05 Sep 2003 18:19:33 GMT
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> There is no hierarchy.  They are just names.  The hierarchy is a fiction.
> Just adopt a convention for how IMAP wants to map the names into a
> hierarchy.
> 
> No one said that user.folder should be interpreted as a child of the inbox.
> It could be a peer.  In terms of the actual storage mapping, they ARE peers;
> there is no hierachy.  You might decide to map inbox children (internally)
> as user.INBOX.folder.  But I do not want to change the basic inbox name from
> user to user.INBOX because of existing repositories.

In fact I was under the impression that INBOX is a reserved folder name, 
that it should always be there, and you are not allowed to create 
subfolders of it.  I don't think many enforce the no-subfolder of INBOX 
rule, and I may just be remembering wrong.

Anyway, the mail servers I am familiar with do place INBOX at the same 
left as Sent, Draft, and whatever other top level folders you might have 
rather than nesting everything under INBOX.  As these IMAP stores are 
developers and we look to share POP3 and IMAP stores, the POP3 handler 
will just know to always user user.INBOX.

-- 
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. sergek@lokitech.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message