james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Serge Knystautas <ser...@lokitech.com>
Subject Re: RemoteDelivery progressively increasing delay-time
Date Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:45:08 GMT
Soeren Hilmer wrote:
> I do not really know how this process works, who has the final word on which 
> of the proposed ways to do this, we go for?

The person who does the work gets by far the most say.  The community 
can suggest designs and may in special cases veto it.

> I like Serge's "attempts" version best, but in this case are maxRetries then 
> to be disregarded? Or is it to be used on the last delaytime entry, if the 
> attempts attribute is missing? (assuming that attempts defaults to 1 if not 
> specified) As this last version is the most versatile, I believe this is the 
> route to go.

Yeah, I had forgotten we couldn't use attributes, so perhaps an optional 
delimiter.

-- 
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. sergek@lokitech.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message