james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen McConnell <mcconn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: James & OpenIM story? (next move?)
Date Thu, 09 Oct 2003 15:04:30 GMT


Alexis Agahi wrote:

>On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:08, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>  
>
>>Steve,
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Merlin doesn't have support for JMX and one of the goals on the
>>>James roadmap is to improve monitoring / management via JMX.
>>>      
>>>
>>Quite correct.  However, today James does use better logging than Merlin
>>supports, and does not use JMX.  Today.  So the logging is the primary
>>blocking factor, because we'd have to give something up to use Merlin.
>>
>>JMX is on the work list for Merlin.  Perhaps Stephen would use James as a
>>test bed when implementing JMX.  That could lead towards a community effort
>>to do some very nice JMX within Merlin and James.
>>    
>>
>
>Ok so what is the next move?
>
>Should we wait for Merlin 3.1 featuring JMX & extended logging?
>(BTW I could help Steve on this task to boost the release cycle)
>

My short term preferences would be to focus engeries on getting the 
logging subsystem upgraded so that we have a viable migration path for 
James.

Cheers, Steve.

-- 

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:mcconnell@apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message