james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini" <vincenzo.gianferrarip...@praxis.it>
Subject RE: AbstractRedirect w/ passThrough = false
Date Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:00:25 GMT
Noel,

Looking at the code, I think that you're right, but ... why did we do it that way at the time?
So many months have passed, so it's difficult to remember.

Let's think on it for a few days, and if next monday nothing against it arises I'll do, test
and commit the small code change.

Vincenzo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: giovedi 8 aprile 2004 0.30
> To: James-Dev Mailing List
> Subject: AbstractRedirect w/ passThrough = false
> 
> 
> In AbstractRedirect, we have (casts removed):
> 
>    newMail = originalMail.duplicate(newName(originalMail));
> 
> Seems to me that if passThrough is false, we can use the same name, and not
> create a new one.  Anyone disagree?  Vincenzo, your thoughts?
> 
> 	--- Noel
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message