james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Zhukov <zhu...@ukrpost.net>
Subject Re: [James-NG] Avalon-free James proposal and reference implementation
Date Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:09:02 GMT
Danny Angus wrote:
>>On a serious note, with a good container & IoC design the effort should
>>be in the application interfaces and the POJOs that implement them
>>rather than in the container framework being used.
> 
> 
> Yep I agree with this.
> 
> I think James would secure itself most against the future by
> developing a set of functional POJO's independant of any container.
> 
> It would then be the responsibility of those who care to assemble them
> into a deployable entity for the container of their choice.
> 
> James could maintain one or more of these deployment sub-projects so
> that we could always deliver a fully working solution, but we'd also
> be delivering mail server functionality which could be widely embedded
> and integrated into a vast range of systems.

Absolutely! Containers do not matter any more.
James-NG is just a collection of POJOs from independent projects plus a 
groovy scripts that glues them all together


> 
> d.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message