james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Noel J. Bergman" <n...@devtech.com>
Subject RE: [James-NG] Groovy after all?
Date Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:54:28 GMT
Serge Knystautas wrote:

> > "Noel J. Bergman" <noel@devtech.com> wrote:
> > > One of the big arguments against Groovy in JamesNG was
> > > the IDE support,
> > > and it seems not to hold in the near future.
> > ??  Where did you hear that?  Groovy works fine with
> > BSF, and there was some
> > work on BSF support.

> Check the thread where we discussed JamesNG.  There was
> concern the Groovy was a newer tech than Java or XML or
> the like, and so you would have less tool (and everything)
> support.  This primarily was in the context of using
> Groovy to assemble the JamesNG POJOs instead of a
> conventional container.

<<shrug>>  My comment was that Groovy should not be the way of doing config,
but it could be A way of driving configuration.  That is far from saying
that JAMES should not have support for Groovy.

	--- Noel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message