james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Serge Knystautas <ser...@lokitech.com>
Subject Re: JMS?...
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:27:41 GMT
apache@bago.org wrote:
> I think that there would be thread pools management at least for
> RemoteDelivery, don't we?

I don't know whether JMS can do the delayed processing, so perhaps we 
use something like Quartz in conjunction with JMS.  But the goal is to 
remove this thread/timing management code from James and rely on more 
tested technologies.

>>Anyway, this is an incredibly non-trivial change, but as long 
>>as people are considering POJO and Spring, this would fit 
>>nicely into that architecture, and it is Apache-style licensing.
> Are you thinking to ActiveMQ as an alternative to
> spoolrepositories/spoolmanager/processors or the
> JamesSpoolManager/LinearProcessor should be translated in a ActiveMQ
> specific broker?

Spool repository is basically a mail repository with a linear processor. 
  Right now Avalon is instantiating a thread pool to manage linear 
processors, and instead LinearProcessor would be a POJO message listener 
of a JMS topic.

Serge Knystautas
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. sergek@lokitech.com

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message