james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Danny Angus <danny.an...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL]
Date Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:27:27 GMT
 we probably _would_ end up with old_head and HEAD as a clone of the
fcs branch in order to preserve the history.

On Apr 12, 2005 9:53 AM, Daniel Perry <d.perry@netcase.co.uk> wrote:
> Daft question, but is it not more sensible to have 3 branches here? head,
> old-head, and branch_2_1_fcs where:
> 
> branch_2_1_fcs is current stable use-this-one branch. For now it is what
> people should check out to get james source, but also keep it for any
> necessary maintenence releases later.
> 
> head is new non-avalon version - "dont use this in a live server" type
> branch - will become release eventually
> 
> head-old is current head.
> 
> Obviously branch_2_1_fcs could be moved to head, and have a new branch for
> development of next gen?
> 
> My argument is that head *should* evolve away from branch_2_1_fcs fairly
> quickly, but in the meantime people are still going to want the source for a
> stable uptodate james?
> 
> Daniel.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Danny Angus [mailto:danny.angus@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 12 April 2005 09:39
> > To: James Developers List
> > Subject: [PROPOSAL]
> >
> >
> > All,
> >
> > *THIS IS NOT A VOTE* Please would you review the following proposal,
> > *before* I ask for a vote on this too.
> >
> > I propose a Vote of Thanks to Noel J Bergman for the outstanding
> > service he has provided, and continues to provide the James project.
> >
> > I further propose that we believe it is unreasonable to expect Noel to
> > shoulder the burden of completing the merge of branch_2_1_fcs and
> > HEAD.
> >
> > I therefore further propose that branch_2_1_fcs be made HEAD and
> > evolved into James next version, and that HEAD be moved into an
> > archive branch from which specific items can be merged as and when
> > required.
> >
> > I suggest the following options:
> >
> > [ ] +1 I agree that branch_2_1_fcs as is should evolve into James next
> > major version
> > [ ] +0 I abstain
> > [ ] -1  I believe that HEAD and branch_2_1_fcs should merge, I am
> > prepared to undertake this work.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message