james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Perry" <d.pe...@netcase.co.uk>
Subject RE: SpringJames vs. JamesNG
Date Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:37:35 GMT
> This is a very good point!
> It is very easy to make a CDI wrapper around an SDI POJO, but the
> other way
> around is rather difficult.
> This is probably the strongest argument for SDI, I gave seen.
> --Søren

So, so far we've settled on SDI POJOs (possibly with CDI wrappers :)

And presumably as we're taking container-independant route, we dont want to
rely on any services / lifecycle from the container.

So would it be sensible to define our own component lifecycle?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message