james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Carr <sc...@progbits.com>
Subject Re: IMAP status
Date Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:21:45 GMT
Steve Brewin wrote:
> Steve Brewin wrote:
>   
>>> Might we move this discussion to server-dev@?  :-)
>>>       
>> Good idea!
>>
>> Sent this to server-dev. Will comment there.
>> Can we agree on org.apache.james.xxx interfaces that capture the behaviour
>> we need a repository to provide? Jason's existing work has surfaced most of
>> the requirements.
>>
>> We can then write adapters for specific implementations such as Javamail or
>> whatever else we agree upon, even change our minds about the implementation
>> in the future without breaking everyones good work. In the meantime, the
>> blocked IMAP development could proceed, writing to these interfaces and
>> using mock implementations.
>>
>> This would allow us to move forward. Of course, we would yet again hit a
>> block if IMAP were done before a repository implementation.
>>
>> -- Steve
>>     
This would be a great idea.  Putting the Repository implementation in an 
interface design means we could also create MBox/MailDir/and Database 
backends more efficiently.

-- 
Scott Carr
OpenOffice.org
Documentation Co-Lead
http://documentation.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message