james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Brewin" <sbre...@synsys.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r413135 -/james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/matchers/AbstractNetworkMatcher.java
Date Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:44:42 GMT
Noel J. Bergman wrote:

> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > i whould like to use setter methods for that in all mailets
> and matchers
> Ah, I just asked you about this.  OK, that explains the change we were
> discussing.  :-)
> > Anyone has a problem with that?
> On the one hand, Java isn't Smalltalk, and I have little need
> to treat it as
> such when initializing simple private properties, but it
> might help eclipse
> users, since the tool can inspect, and we can centralize logging,
> validation, etc., so sure, why not?  For protected and public
> properties,
> I'm sure that we're all +1 to proper bean properties.

+1 For getters and setters for protected and public properties

My personal preference is for private properties too, but its just a
personal preference.

-- Steve

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message