james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)" <server-...@james.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (JAMES-536) Decide what to do with repository implementations configured by default (db/dbfile/file)
Date Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:07:29 GMT
Decide what to do with repository implementations configured by default (db/dbfile/file)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Key: JAMES-536
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-536
     Project: James
        Type: Task

  Components: James Core  
    Versions: 2.3.0b1    
    Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
     Fix For: 2.3.0


Before we make an RC1 we should have fixed all the known issues or moved them to 2.4.

I also don't think that the default use of db and file we have now is the best thing.

We have *dbfile* for inbox and spool repositories.
We have *file* for default repository destinations (see ToRepository mailet)
We have *file* for the outgoing spool repository.

Imho we should move to dbfile everything if we decide to have that as the default.

I don't like having the main spool as dbfile and outgoing as file.


My vote is +1 to move everything to file, db or dbfile. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message