james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: geronimo javamail and James (Was: [RTC] Removal of the javamail-transport code.)
Date Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:39:20 GMT
Why would we need both?

Regards,
Alan

Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> We currently have hardcoded "instanceof" to Sun classes and we use 
> many of the "properties" specific to SUN smtp transport.
>
> Btw I see that the new geronimo javamail code is much more complete 
> and supports many of the properties we use.
>
> What should we do?
> I would like to at least start including handling of geronimo specific 
> exceptions (most times they are the same or very similar but 
> repackaged) but I'm not sure it would be good to add both 
> geronimo-javamail and sun-javamail jars to our distribution (or even 
> to the source build dependencies)..
>
> Any idea?
>
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>> Ok, on to the next phase of the javamail reorganization.  This patch
>>>
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
>>>
>>> is to remove the javamail-transport module and replace it with 
>>> references to the javamail-providers-1.3.1 jar file.
>>> Rick
>> +1
>>
>> BTW, do you think that this code is ready for the Apache James people 
>> to start using?  I noticed that they have sun specific classes in 
>> their server.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message