james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norman Maurer ...@byteaction.de>
Subject Re: "votes" for next 2.3 release
Date Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:46:57 GMT
Am Freitag, den 30.06.2006, 16:29 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> A summary of this week:
> 
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > I hope we don't need a single vote for every single issue, so please 
> > help with short and clear "vote like" answers to the points (I prefer a 
> > clear -1 than a long discussion: at least with a -1 we don't delay the 
> > next release).
> > 
> > --- Add a default hardcoded configuration for the SMTPHandlerChain
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-496
> > 
> > (I would also like to remove the default handlerchain configuration from 
> > the default config.xml and maybe add it to a commented complete config.xml)
> 
> 3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo
> 1 -0 Bernd
> 
> if no other votes in few days I'll backport it.
> 
> > --- Decide what to do with repository implementations configured by 
> > default (db/dbfile/file)
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-536
> > 
> > I think we should put dbfile by default in the advanced config, but use 
> > db or file by default in the default config.xml. I have no real 
> > preference between the 2. I use db, but I think that most "first time" 
> > users would better understand the file repositories.
> 
> db:
> 2 +1 Stefano, Norman
> 
> file:
> 3 +1 Stefano, Vincenzo, Bernd
> 
> dbfile:
> 
> if no one else raise his voice on this issue we should change the 
> default to "file" for users and mail repository.

Ok i changed it to file and closed the issue.
> 
> > --- Remove RepositoryManager and cornerstone-store-impl
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-515
> > 
> > +1 to remove it (backport the trunk change)
> > (Bernd already replied against this, but it is not clear to me wether it 
> > was a -0 or a -1, so please cast a veto if you think it is needed, 
> > otherwise we can count the votes: please don't answer that we should 
> > decide the real plan because I don't believe we can actively discuss 
> > about what is alpha/beta/rc and what should teoretically be included in 
> > the branch. I really prefear e real vote on a real issue. We don't have 
> > a generic rule but at least we know if we agreed to include it or not).
> 
> +1 Stefano, Norman
> -0 Bernd
> -1 Vincenzo *VETO*
> This doesn't need more votes, I just removed this issue from our 2.3 
> roadmap.
> 
> > --- Functionality of DNSServer.getByName(String) is not symetric to 
> > java.net.InetAddress.getByName(String)
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-302
> > 
> > I would like to move this out from the 2.3 roadmap (2.4). We'll discuss 
> > wether to include this or not in 2.4/3.0 later.
> 
> 4 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo, Bernd (WOW, the same for all ;-) )
> Updated JIRA (removed from the 2.3 roadmap)
> 
> > --- Once we'll have decided what to include and included it we are ready 
> > for the next release. Do we want to call it 2.3.0b2 or 2.3.0rc1 ?
> > 
> > here is my vote:
> > +1 for 2.3.0b2
> > +0 for 2.3.0rc1
> 
> 2.3.0b2
> 3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo
> 1 +1 Bernd (if we include JAMES-496)
> 
> 2.3.0rc1
> +1 Stefano
> +1 Bernd (if we don't include JAMES-496)
> -1 Norman
> 
> I think we have to stick to 2.3.0b2 because 2.3.0rc1 has a -1.
I whould like to change it to +1.. after using for a while now.

> 
> Stefano

bye
Norman


Mime
View raw message