james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norman Maurer ...@byteaction.de>
Subject Re: svn commit: r419230 - in /james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver: ./ fastfailfilter/
Date Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:50:26 GMT
My thought on this was to "provide" the dnsserver etc in a easy why
whithout knowing howto lookup the component etc... Maybe you are right
that was why i ask for this ;-) I dedicide to move the code to the
AbstractGeneralHandler cause all this methods can be used in all
handlers..

So you whould stick on the abstract class without the dnsserver etc ?

bye
Norman
 
Am Mittwoch, den 05.07.2006, 19:27 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > what you guys think about the current code ? Should i continue this
> > way ? Or should i revert the last changes ? IMHO its a god step to add
> > the Abstractclasses to make it more API like.. 
> 
> I don't like too much this change because each abstract handler inherith 
> dependencies from the abstracthandler.
> 
> I would put in an AbstractHandler only code that do not intruduce 
> dependencies on not needed services.
> 
> We did the same for Mailets.
> 
> Stefano
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
> 
> !EXCUBATOR:1,44abf72448531821213717!

Mime
View raw message