james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)" <server-...@james.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (JAMES-536) Decide what to do with repository implementations configured by default (db/dbfile/file)
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:34:36 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-536?page=all ]

Stefano Bagnara updated JAMES-536:

    Fix Version: 2.3.0b2
                     (was: 2.3.0)

> Decide what to do with repository implementations configured by default (db/dbfile/file)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>          Key: JAMES-536
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-536
>      Project: James
>         Type: Task

>   Components: James Core
>     Versions: 2.3.0b1
>     Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
>      Fix For: 2.3.0b2

> Before we make an RC1 we should have fixed all the known issues or moved them to 2.4.
> I also don't think that the default use of db and file we have now is the best thing.
> We have *dbfile* for inbox and spool repositories.
> We have *file* for default repository destinations (see ToRepository mailet)
> We have *file* for the outgoing spool repository.
> Imho we should move to dbfile everything if we decide to have that as the default.
> I don't like having the main spool as dbfile and outgoing as file.
> My vote is +1 to move everything to file, db or dbfile. 

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message