james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject Re: "votes" for next 2.3 release
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2006 10:49:53 GMT
Here are the results:

Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> A summary of this week:
> 
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> I hope we don't need a single vote for every single issue, so please 
>> help with short and clear "vote like" answers to the points (I prefer 
>> a clear -1 than a long discussion: at least with a -1 we don't delay 
>> the next release).
>>
>> --- Add a default hardcoded configuration for the SMTPHandlerChain
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-496
>>
>> (I would also like to remove the default handlerchain configuration 
>> from the default config.xml and maybe add it to a commented complete 
>> config.xml)
> 
> 3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo
> 1 -0 Bernd
> 
> if no other votes in few days I'll backport it.

Applied to 2.3.
Moved handlerchain configuration to james-smtphandlerchain.xml and 
commented out by default.

>> --- Decide what to do with repository implementations configured by 
>> default (db/dbfile/file)
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-536
>>
>> I think we should put dbfile by default in the advanced config, but 
>> use db or file by default in the default config.xml. I have no real 
>> preference between the 2. I use db, but I think that most "first time" 
>> users would better understand the file repositories.
> 
> db:
> 2 +1 Stefano, Norman
> 
> file:
> 3 +1 Stefano, Vincenzo, Bernd
> 
> dbfile:
> 
> if no one else raise his voice on this issue we should change the 
> default to "file" for users and mail repository.

Moved to file by Norman.

>> --- Remove RepositoryManager and cornerstone-store-impl
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-515
>>
>> +1 to remove it (backport the trunk change)
>> (Bernd already replied against this, but it is not clear to me wether 
>> it was a -0 or a -1, so please cast a veto if you think it is needed, 
>> otherwise we can count the votes: please don't answer that we should 
>> decide the real plan because I don't believe we can actively discuss 
>> about what is alpha/beta/rc and what should teoretically be included 
>> in the branch. I really prefear e real vote on a real issue. We don't 
>> have a generic rule but at least we know if we agreed to include it or 
>> not).
> 
> +1 Stefano, Norman
> -0 Bernd
> -1 Vincenzo *VETO*
> This doesn't need more votes, I just removed this issue from our 2.3 
> roadmap.

Vetoed. Files have been kept.

>> --- Functionality of DNSServer.getByName(String) is not symetric to 
>> java.net.InetAddress.getByName(String)
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-302
>>
>> I would like to move this out from the 2.3 roadmap (2.4). We'll 
>> discuss wether to include this or not in 2.4/3.0 later.
> 
> 4 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo, Bernd (WOW, the same for all ;-) )
> Updated JIRA (removed from the 2.3 roadmap)

Done.

>> --- Once we'll have decided what to include and included it we are 
>> ready for the next release. Do we want to call it 2.3.0b2 or 2.3.0rc1 ?
>>
>> here is my vote:
>> +1 for 2.3.0b2
>> +0 for 2.3.0rc1
> 
> 2.3.0b2
> 3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo
> 1 +1 Bernd (if we include JAMES-496)
> 
> 2.3.0rc1
> +1 Stefano
> +1 Bernd (if we don't include JAMES-496)
> -1 Norman
> 
> I think we have to stick to 2.3.0b2 because 2.3.0rc1 has a -1.

I think/hope we'll vote for 2.3.0b2 soon.

Stefano


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message