james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini <vincenzo.gianferrarip...@praxis.it>
Subject Re: "votes" for next 2.3 release
Date Mon, 03 Jul 2006 09:59:59 GMT


Norman Maurer wrote:

>Am Freitag, den 30.06.2006, 16:29 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
>  
>
>>A summary of this week:
>>
>>Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I hope we don't need a single vote for every single issue, so please 
>>>help with short and clear "vote like" answers to the points (I prefer a 
>>>clear -1 than a long discussion: at least with a -1 we don't delay the 
>>>next release).
>>>
>>>--- Add a default hardcoded configuration for the SMTPHandlerChain
>>>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-496
>>>
>>>(I would also like to remove the default handlerchain configuration from 
>>>the default config.xml and maybe add it to a commented complete config.xml)
>>>      
>>>
>>3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo
>>1 -0 Bernd
>>
>>if no other votes in few days I'll backport it.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>--- Decide what to do with repository implementations configured by 
>>>default (db/dbfile/file)
>>>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-536
>>>
>>>I think we should put dbfile by default in the advanced config, but use 
>>>db or file by default in the default config.xml. I have no real 
>>>preference between the 2. I use db, but I think that most "first time" 
>>>users would better understand the file repositories.
>>>      
>>>
>>db:
>>2 +1 Stefano, Norman
>>
>>file:
>>3 +1 Stefano, Vincenzo, Bernd
>>
>>dbfile:
>>
>>if no one else raise his voice on this issue we should change the 
>>default to "file" for users and mail repository.
>>    
>>
>
>Ok i changed it to file and closed the issue.
>  
>
>>>--- Remove RepositoryManager and cornerstone-store-impl
>>>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-515
>>>
>>>+1 to remove it (backport the trunk change)
>>>(Bernd already replied against this, but it is not clear to me wether it 
>>>was a -0 or a -1, so please cast a veto if you think it is needed, 
>>>otherwise we can count the votes: please don't answer that we should 
>>>decide the real plan because I don't believe we can actively discuss 
>>>about what is alpha/beta/rc and what should teoretically be included in 
>>>the branch. I really prefear e real vote on a real issue. We don't have 
>>>a generic rule but at least we know if we agreed to include it or not).
>>>      
>>>
>>+1 Stefano, Norman
>>-0 Bernd
>>-1 Vincenzo *VETO*
>>This doesn't need more votes, I just removed this issue from our 2.3 
>>roadmap.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>--- Functionality of DNSServer.getByName(String) is not symetric to 
>>>java.net.InetAddress.getByName(String)
>>>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-302
>>>
>>>I would like to move this out from the 2.3 roadmap (2.4). We'll discuss 
>>>wether to include this or not in 2.4/3.0 later.
>>>      
>>>
>>4 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo, Bernd (WOW, the same for all ;-) )
>>Updated JIRA (removed from the 2.3 roadmap)
>>
>>    
>>
>>>--- Once we'll have decided what to include and included it we are ready 
>>>for the next release. Do we want to call it 2.3.0b2 or 2.3.0rc1 ?
>>>
>>>here is my vote:
>>>+1 for 2.3.0b2
>>>+0 for 2.3.0rc1
>>>      
>>>
>>2.3.0b2
>>3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo
>>1 +1 Bernd (if we include JAMES-496)
>>
>>2.3.0rc1
>>+1 Stefano
>>+1 Bernd (if we don't include JAMES-496)
>>-1 Norman
>>
>>I think we have to stick to 2.3.0b2 because 2.3.0rc1 has a -1.
>>    
>>
>I whould like to change it to +1.. after using for a while now.
>  
>
I hope to put the current branch 2.3 in production in the next few days 
and keep an eye on it for a week or so. It should be a good test.

Ciao,

Vincenzo

>  
>
>>Stefano
>>    
>>
>
>bye
>Norman
>
>  
>

Mime
View raw message